Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Performance of Education Unit-Earner Teachers in Public Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.524Keywords:
Education unit-earners, Pedagogical content knowledge, Philippines, Quantitative research, Teaching performance.Abstract
Education unit-earner teachers, or those licensed teachers who are non-education graduates, play an increasingly important role in the Philippine public school system, raising important considerations about how well-equipped they are with pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) to ensure quality instruction. This study was conducted primarily to determine if their level of PCK, measured in terms of content knowledge, knowledge of learners, curriculum understanding, and pedagogy, significantly influences their Teaching Performance (TP) in terms of learning environment and learner diversity, curriculum planning, assessment and reporting, community linkages, and teacher professionalism. Using a descriptive-regression analysis design, 100 licensed secondary teachers in Davao Occidental DepEd Division were surveyed. Findings revealed that the respondents exhibited excellent PCK (x̄ =4.24), as well as excellent TP (x̄ =4.24). Regression analysis showed that PCK is a statistically significant and positive predictor of TP among Education unit-earner teachers. The regression model indicates that for every one-unit increase in PCK, teaching performance increases by 0.362 units. The model demonstrated a high level of statistical significance (p < .001) and an R² value of 0.471, meaning that PCK explains about 47.1% of the differences in teaching performance among the respondents. The remaining 52.9% is likely influenced by other factors not included in the model. The study recommends enhancing the curriculum and practicum of certification programs for Education unit-earners, strengthening licensure policies to include pedagogical training and mentoring, as well as institutionalizing targeted professional development in schools. The study recommends enhancing certification programs for education unit-earners through improved pedagogical training, practicum, and mentoring. Curricula should emphasize inclusive, differentiated, and reflective teaching. Licensure policies must uphold pedagogical rigor, and schools should institutionalize peer coaching and collaborative planning. Finally, future research should examine the long-term development of PCK and investigate other factors that could also influence TP.
Downloads
References
Aheisibwe, I., & Barigye, E. (2023). Pedagogical experiences of Bishop Stuart University students on school practice about the new lower secondary school curriculum in South Western Uganda. East African Journal of Education Studies, 6(1), 291–296. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajes.6.1.1140
Akkaya, S. (2021). Technological pedagogical content knowledge as a predictor of physical education and sports teachers' evaluations of distance education. Kıbrıslı Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 16(4), 1643–1659. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i4.6028
Akram, H., Yingxiu, Y., Al-Adwan, A. S., & Alkhalifah, A. (2021). Technology integration in higher education during COVID-19: An assessment of online teaching competencies through technological pedagogical content knowledge model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 736522. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736522
Arayan, D. V., & Abapo, D. (2024). Experiences of non-education graduate teachers in the conduct of classroom observation. Franciscan College of the Immaculate Conception Insights, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13316335
Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
Department of Education. (2017). Philippine professional standards for teachers. Teacher Education Council. https://shorturl.at/jiGof
Diehm, E. A., & Hendricks, A. E. (2021). Teachers' content knowledge and pedagogical beliefs regarding the use of African American English. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 52(1), 100–117. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_LSHSS-19-00101
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Fukaya, T., Nakamura, D., Kitayama, Y., & Nakagoshi, T. (2025). A systematic review and meta-analysis of research on mathematics and science pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring its associations with teacher and student variables. Teaching and Teacher Education, 155, 104881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104881
Goos, M., Stillman, G., Herbert, S., & Geiger, V. (2020). Teaching secondary school mathematics: Research and practice for the 21st century. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117810
Guadalquiver, N. J., & Tagadiad, C. L. (2023). Job shift from industry to academe: The plight of education unit earners teaching TLE subjects. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 8(12), 2140. https://tinyurl.com/mryzytek
Guo, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, Y., & Xie, J. (2024). Comparing the teaching quality of alternatively certified teachers and traditionally certified teachers: Findings from a large-scale study. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 36, 75–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-023-09426-1
Halim, L., Abdullah, S. I. S., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2012). Students’ perceptions of their science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Research in Science & Technological Education, 30(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2012.678740
Kim, I., & Ko, B. (2020). Content knowledge, enacted pedagogical content knowledge, and student performance between teachers with different levels of content expertise. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 39(1), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2018-0292
Lee Shing, C., Mohd. Saat, R., & Loke, S. H. (2015). The knowledge of teaching – Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 3(3), 1–14. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1085915.pdf
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95–132). Springer Netherlands.
Manigbas, J. I., Ollet, A. L., Noble, M. P. L., Angeles, J. R., Cayetano, N. M., & Fucio, M. P. (2024). Teachers’ competency in content knowledge and pedagogy in Buhi South District, Philippines. International Education Trend Issues, 2(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.56442/ieti.v2i1.365
Mordeno, J. (2022). Effectiveness of senior high school unit earner teachers and the academic performance of students. EPRA International Journal of Environmental Economics, Commerce and Educational Management, 20–31. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra10779
Neumann, K., Kind, V., & Harms, U. (2019). Probing the amalgam: The relationship between science teachers’ content, pedagogical and pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 41(7), 847–861. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1497217
Nind, M. (2020). A new application for the concept of pedagogical content knowledge: Teaching advanced social science research methods. Oxford Review of Education, 46(2), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2019.1644996
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Professional Regulation Commission. (2022). Resolution No. 24, series of 2022: Providing the new descriptive titles of the subjects in professional education. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/mr3hkay5
Reynolds, W. M., & Park, S. (2021). Examining the relationship between the educative teacher performance assessment and preservice teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(5), 721–748. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21676
Shogbesan, Y., & Ahmed, A. (2023). Exploring pedagogical content knowledge of teachers: A paradigm for measuring teacher’s effectiveness. Pedagogi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.24036/pedagogi.v23i1.1540
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X01500200
Somosot, I., & Relox, C. (2023). Student to teacher: Experiences of non-education graduates teaching in higher education institutions. Asian Journal of University Education, 19(4), 759–767. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v19i4.24837
Taryana, T., Riniati, W. O., Haddar, G. A., Sembiring, D., & Mutmainnah, M. (2023). The influence of teacher certification and teaching motivation on teacher performance. Journal on Education, 5(3), 6726–6735. http://jonedu.org/index.php/joe
Tseng, J. J., Chai, C. S., Tan, L., & Park, M. (2022). A critical review of research on technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in language teaching. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 948–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1868531
Vicente, A., & Salendab, R. L. A. (2022). The instructional experiences on SKSU-Kalamansig campus: The case of non-teacher education graduates. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7030970
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
