Social Predictors of Prosocial Behavior Among Filipino Adolescent College Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.464Keywords:
Filipino, Individual factors, Late adolescent, Prosocial, Social factorsAbstract
Prosocial behavior is an important developmental outcome in adolescence, yet studies in the Filipino context are limited, particularly in understanding the role of social factors. This study aimed to examine how empathy, moral reasoning, and social influences from parents, peers, and school predict prosocial behavior among Filipino adolescent college students. Using a descriptive-correlational design, data were collected from 100 participants aged 18–21 years through standardized online questionnaires: Prosocialness Scale for Adults, Toronto Empathy Questionnaire, Schutte Self-Report Emotional Intelligence Test (moral reasoning), Parent–Adult Child Relationship Questionnaire, Peer Relationships Scale, and Positive Youth Development Scale. Results indicated high levels of moral reasoning (M=125.0, SD=13.5) and empathy (M=47.7, SD=8.2), while scores for parental influence (M=53.3, SD=11.3), peer relationships (M=15.6, SD=2.5), school environment (M=83.5, SD=14.8), and prosocial behavior (M=65.3, SD=9.7) were moderate. Correlation analysis revealed significant positive associations between prosocial behavior and moral reasoning (r=0.49, p<0.01), empathy (r=0.29, p<0.01), parental influence (r=0.32, p<0.01), and school environment (r=0.43, p<0.01), with no significant correlation for peer influence. Multiple regression analysis indicated moral reasoning (β=0.33, p<0.05) as the strongest predictor, accounting for 23.9% of variance in prosocial behavior (F[5,74]=5.96, p<0.001). This suggests that, within this Filipino adolescent group, internalized moral values are more pivotal in shaping prosocial behavior compared to empathy or external social influences. These findings underline the importance of designing culturally responsive programs that specifically enhance moral reasoning to foster prosocial behaviors among Filipino adolescents effectively.
Downloads
References
Bergin, C. (2014). Educating students to be prosocial at school. In L. Padilla-Walker & G. Carlo (Eds.), The multidimensionality of prosocial behavior: Biological, socialization, and contextual perspectives (pp. 279–304). Oxford University Press. https://tinyurl.com/38edxj5y
Bowen, C. E., Spuling, S. M., Kornadt, A. E., & Wiest, M. (2019). Young people feel wise and older people feel energetic: Comparing age stereotypes and self-evaluations across adulthood. European Journal of Ageing, 16(2), 171–180. https://tinyurl.com/y2mzftut
Busching, R., & Krahé, B. (2020). With a little help from their peers: The impact of classmates on adolescents' development of prosocial behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(9), 1849–1863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01260-8
Datu, J. A. D., & Bernardo, A. B. I. (2020). The blessings of social-oriented virtues: Interpersonal character strengths are linked to increased life satisfaction and academic success among Filipino high school students. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(7), 983–990. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620906294
David, E. J. R., Sharma, D. K. B., & Petalio, J. (2017). Losing kapwa: Colonial legacies and the Filipino American family. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 8(1), 43–55.
https://doi.org/10.1037/aap0000068
Ding, W., Shao, Y., Sun, B., Xie, R., Li, W., & Wang, X. (2018). How can prosocial behavior be motivated? The different roles of moral judgment, moral elevation, and moral identity among the young Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 814. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00814
Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2023). Prosocial development. In M. E. Lamb & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (7th ed., pp. 610–658). Wiley. https://tinyurl.com/4ct4pc9s.
Ellemers, N., van der Toorn, J., Paunov, Y., & van Leeuwen, T. (2019). The psychology of morality: A review and analysis of empirical studies. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(4), 332–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868318811759
Flynn, H. K., Felmlee, D. H., Shu, X., & Conger, R. D. (2018). Mothers and fathers matter: The influence of parental support, hostility, and problem-solving on adolescent friendships. Journal of Family Issues, 39(8), 2389–2412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X18755423
Guerrero, A. P. S., Nishimura, S. T., Chang, J. Y., Ona, C., Cunanan, V. L., & Hishinuma, E. S. (2019). Low cultural identification, low parental involvement and adverse peer influences as risk factors for delinquent behaviour among Filipino youth in Hawai'i. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 56(4), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764009102772
Hastings, P. D., & Miller, J. G. (2022). Prosocial behavior and moral development in adolescence. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 495–519. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-070220
Jin, S., Balliet, D., Romano, A., Spadaro, G., van Lissa, C. J., Agostini, M., Bélanger, J. J., Gutzkow, B., & Kreienkamp, J. (2021). Intergenerational conflicts of interest and prosocial behavior during the COVID19 pandemic. Personality and Individual Differences, 171, 110535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110535
Klein, N. (2016). Prosocial behavior increases perceptions of meaning in life. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(4), 354–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1209541
Luengo Kanacri, B. P., Eisenberg, N., Thartori, E., Pastorelli, C., Uribe Tirado, L. M., Gerbino, M., & Caprara, G. V. (2017). Longitudinal relations among positivity, perceived positive school climate, and prosocial behavior in Colombian adolescents. Child Development, 88(4), 1100–1114. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12863
Malonda, E., Llorca, A., Mesurado, B., Samper, P., & Mestre, M. V. (2019). Parents or peers? Predictors of prosocial behavior and aggression: A longitudinal study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2379 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02379
Mestre, M. V., Carlo, G., Samper, P., Malonda, E., & Llorca Mestre, A. (2019). Bidirectional relations among empathy-related traits, prosocial moral reasoning, and prosocial behaviors. Social Development, 28(3), 514–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12366
Scott, K., & Yu, G. (2022). Moral decision making in adolescents: The effects of peer attachment, interpersonal affect, and gender. Journal of Adolescence, 94(3), 442–456.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12015
Silke, C., Brady, B., Boylan, C., & Dolan, P. (2018). Factors influencing the development of empathy and prosocial behavior among adolescents: A systematic review. Children and Youth Services Review, 94, 421– 436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.07.027
Simon-Thomas, E. R. (2020). Find social media frustrating? Try empathy. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/43d8fxjk
Syamsu, Y., Ilfiandra, & Sofwan, A. (2020). The effect of parenting patterns and empathy behavior on youth prosocial. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 223–232.
https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13315a
Van de Groep, S., Zanolie, K., Green, K. H., Sweijen, S. W., & Crone, E. A. (2020). A daily diary study on adolescents’ mood, empathy, and prosocial behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLOS ONE, 15(10), e0240349. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240349
Wang, H., Wu, S., & Wei, C. (2021). Emotional intelligence and prosocial behavior in college students: A moderated mediation analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 713227.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713227
Yeo, J. H., & Kim, J. S. (2021). The psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Toronto empathy questionnaire. Healthcare (Basel), 9(7), 808. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9070808
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
