Teacher Agency: Bridging Gaps in Elementary Curriculum Implementation

Authors

  • Jade T. Librando Institute of Graduate and Professional Education, Davao del Sur State College, Davao del Sur, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.714

Keywords:

Curriculum implementation, Educational reform, Elementary education, Systemic misalignment, Teacher agency

Abstract

This comparative case study investigates the widespread challenge of curriculum implementation gaps in elementary education by examining teacher experiences across three distinct curricular approaches in the Philippines. The research addressed a critical gap in the literature by simultaneously analyzing foundational (Blocks of Time), revised (K-12), and pilot (MATATAG) curricula to identify systemic barriers and effective adaptive strategies. Utilizing in-depth thematic analysis of interviews with three public school teachers (representing Kindergarten, Grade 3, and Grade 4), the study provided a detailed, triangulated perspective across diverse contexts. Principal results consistently revealed a profound systemic misalignment—characterized by content overload, rigid pacing mandates that conflict with pedagogical goals, and widespread resource deficits. In response, the study determined that Teacher Professional Agency functions as an unrecognized operational safeguard, enabling continuity through strategic content prioritization and peer collaboration (Learning Action Cells). The major conclusion is that these implementation failures fundamentally undermine the success of policy. This necessitates an urgent policy shift that formalizes Teacher Agency as a core strategy for effective, localized curriculum delivery, moving beyond treating it as a simple coping mechanism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Blasabas, R. J., & Sumaljag, M. V. (2021). Philippine K to 12 implementation: Difficulties and coping strategies of public elementary school administrators. SLONGAN, 5(1), 63–87. https://tinyurl.com/4hmh4n3a

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications Inc.

Dela Cruz, A., & Reyes, M. (2024). Teacher autonomy and adaptive strategies during the MATATAG curriculum transition. Journal of Educational Innovation and Practice, 8(1), 120–135. https://tinyurl.com/2vyu9f2u

Dizon, R. B., & Cruz, F. C. (2022). The cost of curriculum reform: Teacher stress and professional efficacy in high-workload settings. Journal of Educational Psychology and Counseling, 7(2), 45–60. https://tinyurl.com/4sdrcr6e

Guevara, L. S. (2021). Implementation of play-based learning in Kindergarten: Challenges and parental involvement in rural schools. Philippine Journal of Early Childhood Education, 15(1), 30–45.

Harris, A. (2020). COVID-19—School leadership in crisis? Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 5(3–4), 329–333. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-06-2020-0038

Kilag, O. K., Sasan, J. M., Largo, J. K., & Alvez, G. U. (2024). The implementation of the MATATAG curriculum: Challenges and prospects. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 10(1), 10–25. https://tinyurl.com/ynxphndm

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

Magno, C. R. (2022). Developmental assessment challenges in early grades: Aligning policy with teacher practice. Philippine Education Review: ECE Focus, 8(3), 110–125.

Mendoza, L. V., & Mendoza, J. M. (2021). Curriculum congestion in the K to 12 program: Teacher perspectives on content overload and pacing. Philippine Journal of Education, 45(2), 50–65. https://tinyurl.com/52a9m7kz

Mercado, D. G. (2023). Decentralization and local curriculum adaptation in DepEd: A policy analysis. Philippine Educational Policy Review, 6(1), 70–85.

Navarro, E. M., & Santos, C. L. (2024). Beyond compliance: Teacher perspectives on professional development needs for the MATATAG curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies and Research, 10(1), 25–40.

O'Dwyer, M., & Smith, J. (2021). The impact of implementation fatigue on educational change: A systematic review. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(5), 780–801. https://tinyurl.com/4mbx3kmx

Panti, A. C., Panti, A. V., & Panti, A. M. (2022). Elementary teachers' challenges in the implementation of the K-12 curriculum in a new normal setup. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 8(2), 1–15. https://tinyurl.com/mry4wyxv

Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2020). Teacher agency in the curriculum: Intentionality and the professional. Curriculum Inquiry, 50(4), 369–390. https://tinyurl.com/4hzrf4wh

Ramos, E. F., & Estrella, M. C. (2024). Resource constraints and training gaps in the MATATAG curriculum rollout: A logistical analysis. Philippine Educational Review, 5(1), 20–35. https://tinyurl.com/2p8ad2b5

Sarmiento, L. F. (2023). Teacher retention and job satisfaction amidst continuous educational reform. Philippine Journal of Educational Management, 15(4), 95–110.

Torres, A. L., & Manalo, B. G. (2023). Professional autonomy and peer collaboration: Teacher strategies in navigating curriculum reform. Asian Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 150–165. https://tinyurl.com/2mhr3m6n

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications Inc.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-25

How to Cite

Librando, J. (2025). Teacher Agency: Bridging Gaps in Elementary Curriculum Implementation. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(12), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.714