Level of Perception on Learning Retention and Academic Achievement of Elementary Education Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.730Keywords:
Learning retention, Academic achievement, Level of perception, Descriptive research, Elementary education studentsAbstract
This study aimed to assess perceptions of learning retention and academic achievement among Elementary Education students at Davao del Sur State College. A descriptive research design was employed, involving 86 respondents. Pearson's r was used to determine the relationship between learning retention and academic achievement. Findings revealed that students demonstrated high learning retention, suggesting they are likely able to achieve mastery through their own learning strategies. Their academic achievement was also found to be very satisfactory, indicating consistent engagement with their studies. However, the results further showed that there is no significant relationship between learning retention and academic achievement among the respondents.
Downloads
References
Angeles, E. (2018). Significance of learning diversity in the K to 12 curriculum. Sun.Star Pampanga. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/3s25d2d7
Bennett, M. J. (1993). Toward Ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In R. M. Paige (Ed.), Education for the Intercultural Experience (pp. 21–71). Intercultural Press.
Bray, B. (2012). Personalized learning. Retrieved from http://barbarabray.net/personalized-learning/
Bray, B., & McCluskey, K. (2015). Learner voice and choice lead to engagement. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/unu6tfb7
Chiu, M. M., Chow, B. W.-Y., & Mcbride-Chang, C. (2007). Universals and specifics in learning strategies: Explaining adolescent Mathematics, Science, and reading achievement across 34 countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(4), 344–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.007
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications. Retrieved from https://study.sagepub.com/creswellrd4e
Curtis, D. D., & Lawson, M. J. (2001). Exploring collaborative online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(1), 21–34. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/4v5j6seu
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000
Dotson, R. A. (2016). Does goal setting with elementary students impact reading growth? ProQuest LLC. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED567665&
Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2005). Understanding student differences. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00829.x
Field, K. (2018). Teacher and student perceptions of student engagement in a 9th-grade classroom. Doctoral Dissertations. https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/dissertations/1731
Francis, J. (2017). The effects of technology on student motivation and engagement in classroom-based learning. All Theses and Dissertations. https://dune.une.edu/theses/121
Grant, P., & Basye, D. (2014). Personalized learning: A guide for engaging students with technology. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/5n84y5ut
Hughey, J. (2020). Individual personalized learning. New Prairie Press. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1275355
Hunt, R. (2012). The effects of goal setting in a developmental Algebra course. Masters Theses & Specialist Projects. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/1139
Kulasegaram, K., & Rangachari, P. K. (2018). Beyond “formative”: Assessments to enrich student learning. Advances in Physiology Education, 42(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00122.2017
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Prentice Hall. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/ye3vsrd5
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000
Liu, S.-H., Tsai, H.-C., & Huang, Y.-T. (2015). Collaborative professional development of mentor teachers and pre-service teachers in relation to technology integration. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 161–172. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1070041&
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/pbzuxv59
Marco‐Bujosa, L. M., & Levy, A. J. (2016). Caught in the balance: An organizational analysis of Science teaching in schools with elementary Science specialists. Science Education, 100(6), 983–1008. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21239
Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. https://tinyurl.com/4j3kuywp
Pennequin, V., Sorel, O., Nanty, I., & Fontaine, R. (2010). Metacognition and low achievement in Mathematics: The effect of training in the use of metacognitive skills to solve Mathematical word problems. Thinking & Reasoning, 16(3), 198–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2010.509052
Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Teacher–student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 365–386). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_17
Pillado, I. A., Futalan, M. C. Z., & Comighud, S. M. (2020). Factors on memory retention: Effect on students’ academic performance. https://tinyurl.com/3mdk4z4m
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Pianta, R., Hamre, B., & Allen, J. (2012). Teacher–student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 365–386). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_17
Susak, M. (2016). Factors that affect classroom participation. Rochester Institute of Technology. Retrieved from https://repository.rit.edu/theses/9370
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking styles (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584152
Suter, W. N. (2012). Introduction to educational research: A critical thinking approach (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/yeykhc4b
Tariq, S., Khan, M. A., Afzal, S., Shahzad, S. R., Hamza, M., Khan, H. A., Qamar, F., Javed, M., Ashraf, M. F., Mubarak, F., Puri, B. I., Masood, T., Kazim, F., Shaukat, T., & Shaikh, S. (2016). Association between academic learning strategies and annual examination results among medical students of King Edward Medical University. Annals of King Edward Medical University, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v22i2.1290
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). ASCD. https://tinyurl.com/3mm2z755
Vettori, G., Vezzani, C., Bigozzi, L., & Pinto, G. (2020). Upper secondary school students’ conceptions of learning, learning strategies, and academic achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 113(6), 475–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2020.1861583
Vibulphol, J. (2016). Students’ motivation and learning, and teachers’ motivational strategies in English classrooms in Thailand. English Language Teaching, 9(4), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n4p64
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). “Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview.” Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/4csyaj4r
Zmuda, A., Ullman, D., & Curtis, G. (2015). Learning personalized: The evolution of the contemporary classroom. Jossey-Bass. San Francisco, CA
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
