Evaluation of Undergraduate Research Course Using Stufflebeam's Context, Input, Process, Product Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2023.0003Keywords:
research, evaluation, CIPP, undergraduate researchAbstract
An undergraduate research course is often considered the pinnacle of a student's college experience, as it allows them to apply both the soft and hard skills acquired during their academic journey. In order to ensure students gain relevant experiences that align with desired learning outcomes, the evaluation of such courses is essential. This study explores the perceptions of graduating research students regarding their experiences in undergraduate research courses. Using a descriptive survey, data was collected from 60 students to investigate their views. The assessment of their evaluation of the course was based on their level of agreement with statements related to context, input, process, and outcomes of their Undergraduate Research Experience (URE). The majority of students indicated strong agreement with most statements. However, their agreement was only moderate concerning the availability and usefulness of library and laboratory resources, the financial support available for research, and the accessibility of research advisors. In conclusion, the students' perceptions suggest that the undergraduate research course aligns well with the intended outcomes. Nevertheless, the findings highlight the necessity to evaluate and enhance laboratory and library resources to better support engineering research. Moreover, implementing financial support mechanisms to alleviate financial barriers in conducting studies and optimizing the support provided by research advisors is recommended.
Downloads
References
Arellano, E.R., Morano, L. N., and Nepomuceno, C.T. (2012). Assessing Undergraduate Research Competence: Readiness for Research-oriented Jobs. Development Education Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(2). https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=6621
Avilla, R.A. (2016). Practical Research 1. Diwa Learnings Systems Inc.
Belino, M., and Bosshard, H.F. (2011). Towards an Outcomes-Based Mechanical Engineering Education in the Philippines and the Mapua Institute of Technology School of Mechanical Engineering Experience. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1236048
Butler, M. (2004). Outcomes Based/Outcomes Focused Education Overview. Retrieved from www.kfshrc.edu.sa//files/Outcomes%20Based%20Education.doc.
Campillan, R.G. (2019). Difficulties in Research Writing among Communication Students in a Private University. Augustinian, 2(1). https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=14786
Chinta, R., Kebritchi, M., Ellias, J. (2016). A Conceptual Model for Evaluating Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(6), 989-1002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-09-2015-0120
CIPP Model (n.d.). Retrieved from https://poorvucenter.yale.edu/CIPP
Clemeña, R.M., and Acosta, S.A. (2007). Developing Research Culture in Philippine Higher Education Institutions: Perspectives of University Faculty. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000157869_eng
Creswell, J.W. (2014). Educational Research, Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson Education Inc., 4th ed.
Edward, N.S. (2002). The Role of Laboratory Work in Engineering Education: Student and Staff Perceptions. The International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Education. doi:10.7227/IJEEE.39.1.2
Frey, B.B. (2018). CIPP Evaluation Model. Retrieved from http://sk.sagepub.com/reference/sage-encyclopedia-of-educational-research-measurement-evaluation/i4690.xml
Gunasekera, C. (2010). Students Usage of an Academic Library: a user survey conducted at the Main Library University of Peradeniya. Journal of the University Librarians Association of Sri Lanka, 14(1), pp.43–60. DOI: http://doi.org/10.4038/jula.v14i1.2687
Holstein, W.K. (n.d.). Research and development. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/research-and development
Howison, J., Gonzalez, R., Maier, C., Bass, P., and Washuta, N. (2018). Benefits and Challenges of Undergraduate Research. http://www.asee-se.org/proceedings/ASEE2018/papers2018/12.pdf
Jamieson, S. (2007). Likert Scale. Encyclopedia of Epidemiology (2007). Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/Likert-Scale
Jin, Z., Li, S., and Xu, J. (2014). Quality Evaluation of Undergraduate Thesis as the Goal of Applied Talent's Cultivation -Based on the Self-Assessment Analysis of Accounting Major Theses. doi: 10.2991/ermm-14.2014.42.
Mapa, D.S. (n.d.). Research Culture in the Philippines. Retrieved from nast.ph
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (1995). Forces Shaping the U.S. Academic Engineering Research Enterprise. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press https://www.nap.edu/read/4933/chapter/4
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Undergraduate Research Experiences for STEM Students: Successes, Challenges, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.17226/24622.
Petrella, J. K., and Jung, A. P. (2008). Undergraduate Research: Importance, Benefits, and Challenges. International journal of exercise science, 1(3), 91–95.
PH lacks 19,000 scientists in research and dev't – Bam Aquino (2017). Retrieved from https://www.rappler.com/nation/philippines-lack-scientists-bam-aquino
Ruchina, A., Kuimova, M., Polyushko, D., Sentsov, A., Jin, Z. (2015). The Role of Research Work in the Training of Master Students Studying at Technical University. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 215. 98-101. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.580.
Sancar, T., Hatice, B., Meltem, H., and Fadde, P. (2013). Applying the Context, Input, Process, Product Evaluation Model for Evaluation, Research, and Redesign of an Online Master's Program. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 14. 273-293. 10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1485.
Seymour, E., Hunter, A.B., Laursen, S.L. and DeAntoni, T. (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three‐year study. Sci. Ed., 88: 493-534. doi:10.1002/sce.10131
Sharma, K., Sharma, Y., Mantri, A., and Sharma, R. (2020). Inculcating the spirit and passion for research among Engineering students at Undergraduate level. Procedia Computer Science, 172: 488-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.162.
Tan, E. (2011). “It takes two to tango:” The language of research mentoring. The Asian Journal of Educational Research and Synergy, 3(1). Retrieved from http://ejournals.ph/form/cite.php?id=1147
Thurab-Nkhosi, D. (2019). The Evaluation of a Blended Faculty Development Course Using the CIPP Model. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 15(1).
Understanding Research. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.etu.org.za/toolbox/docs/development/research.html
Wayan, M.A. (2018). Status of research and development in the Philippines. Retrieved from https://www.pressreader.com/philippines/ sunstarbaguio/20181012/281629601233514
Zydney, A.L., Bennett, J.S., Shahid, A. and Bauer, K.W. (2002), Impact of Undergraduate Research Experience in Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 91: 151-157. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002.tb00687.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
