Enhancing Active Learning through Classroom Response Systems: A Mixed-Method Study with Plickers in First-Year Teacher Education

Authors

  • Terence Katherine Stephanie R. Gapol Teacher Education Program, Initao College Initao, Misamis Oriental, Philippines
  • Sydney Jay B. Villarin Teacher Education Program, Initao College Initao, Misamis Oriental, Philippines
  • Ma. Izabel T. Cabasan Teacher Education Program, Initao College Initao, Misamis Oriental, Philippines
  • Pedra A. Baculio Teacher Education Program, Initao College Initao, Misamis Oriental, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.074

Keywords:

Active learning, Classroom response system, Educational technology, Plickers, Student engagement, Higher education, Teacher education

Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of Plickers as a Classroom Response System (CRS) in fostering an active learning environment among first-year Education students at Initao College. Specifically, it aims to (1) assess the significant improvement in students’ performance in the Principles of Learning lesson before and after using Plickers and (2) examine students’ experiences in fostering an active learning environment through this technology. A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design incorporated both quantitative and qualitative methods. The quantitative aspect involved a pre-test and post-test assessment, measuring the learning gains of 20 first-year Education students. The qualitative aspect utilized thematic analysis to capture students’ experiences and perceptions of Plickers. The pre-test and post-test, covering 125 quiz points across topics such as Research Designs, Principles of Learning, Elements of Learning, and Child and Adolescent Development, were facilitated using an LED projector, laptop, clicker, mobile phone, and whiteboard. Results revealed a statistically significant improvement in students’ post-test scores compared to their pre-test performance (Wilcoxon Rank test, p < 0.001). The qualitative findings identified positive emotional responses, increased engagement, and inclusivity as key benefits of Plickers, with students expressing enjoyment, reduced anxiety, and active participation. However, challenges such as time pressure and physical fatigue were noted. The study highlights the potential of Plickers as an effective digital tool in higher education, promoting interactive learning and real-time assessment. Future recommendations include optimizing response time, further integrating technology in teacher education, and exploring the impact of Plickers not only in teacher education programs but also in higher education programs and basic education programs across different disciplines, such as social studies, languages, sciences, and mathematics, to assess its broader applicability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Babacan, N., & Güler, C. (2022). The effects of Plickers on English vocabulary achievement, motivation, and anxiety. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(2), 617-630. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.05.04.648

Chanialidis, C. (2019). Enabling active learning in large classes through the use of Plickers. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3336383

Chng, L., & Gurvitch, R. (2018). Using Plickers as an assessment tool in health and physical education settings. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 89(2), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2017.1404510

Chou, P. N. (2022). Using Plickers to support student learning in rural schools: A comprehensive analysis. SAGE Open, 12(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221116109 Daradkah, H. M. (2020). The effectiveness of using Plickers program in structural assessment for the development of achievement and motivation towards it for the third grade primary

students in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Journal of Educational & Psychological Sciences, 21(2).

Elmahdi, I., Al-Hattami, A., & Fawzi, H. (2018). Using technology for formative assessment to improve students’ learning. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology,

17(2). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1176157.pdf

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

Hassan, F. A., & Hashim, H. (2021). The use of an interactive online tool (Plickers) in learning vocabulary among young learners in ESL setting. Creative Education, 12(04), 780–796. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2021.124055

İner, N., Irk, H. S., Ceylan, M. & Üstün, S. (2022). The effects of practicing vocabulary via Plickers on the 4th year Turkish students' vocabulary acquisition in EFL classes. Manisa Celal Bayar University International Journal of English Language Studies, 1 (1), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7915597

Kent, D. (2019). Plickers and the pedagogical practicality of fast formative assessment. Teaching English with Technology, 19(3), 90-104. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1224605.pdf Masita, M., & Fitri, N. (2020). The use of Plickers for formative assessment of vocabulary mastery. Ethical Lingua, 7(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.30605/25409190.179

McCargo, M. G. (2017). The effects of Plickers as response cards on academic engagement behavior in high school students (Master's thesis). The University of Southern Mississippi. https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/300/

Michael, E. A., Ejeng, I. E. A., Udit, M. A., & Yunus, M. M. (2019). The use of Plickers for language assessment of reading comprehension. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(1), 637-645. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v9-i1/5464

Mshayisa, V. (2020). Students’ perceptions of Plickers and crossword puzzles in undergraduate studies. Journal of Food Science Education, 19(2), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541- 4329.12179

Pearson, R. J. (2020). Clickers versus Plickers: Comparing two audience response systems in a smartphone-free teaching environment. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(8), 2342-2346. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00464

Ruisoto, P., & Juanes, J. A. (2019). Fostering student's engagement and active learning in neuroscience education. Journal of Medical Systems, 43(3), 66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916- 019-1192-x

Sasmiko, A. R., Noni, N., & Salija, K. (2019). The use of Plickers to enhance students’ English reading comprehension at SMP Muhammadiyah 6 Makassar. Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Sciences and Teacher Profession. https://eprints.unm.ac.id/15073/1/Article%20The%20Use%20of%20Plickers%20to%20Enhance%20Students.pdf

Shana, Z. A., & Al Baki, S. A. (2020). Using Plickers in formative assessment to augment student learning. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 12(2), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijmbl.2020040104

Wiyaka, W., & Prastikawati, E. F. (2021). Plickers as an online formative assessment to improve secondary school students’ English learning. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Education & Social Science Research (ICESRE) 2020. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3864809

Wuttiprom, S., Toeddhanya, K., Buachoom, A., & Wuttisela, K. (2017). Using Plickers cooperate with peer instruction to promote students’ discussion in introductory physics course.

Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(11), 1955–1961. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.051111

Downloads

Published

2025-05-03

How to Cite

Gapol, T. K. S., Villarin, S. J., Cabasan, M. I., & Baculio, P. (2025). Enhancing Active Learning through Classroom Response Systems: A Mixed-Method Study with Plickers in First-Year Teacher Education. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(5), 621–630. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.074