Technological and Pedagogical Knowledge in Relation to Teaching Proficiency among Criminology Faculty

Authors

  • Rey James L. Amba Tagoloan Community College, Tagoloan, Misamis Oriental, Philippines
  • Chibert L. Jala Department of Education - Magayad Integrated School, Cagayan de Oro City, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0545

Keywords:

Pedagogical knowledge, Teaching proficiency, Technological knowledge

Abstract

The transition from traditional face-to-face to online learning as an alternative course during the pandemic shifts different factors toward educators. This study determined the technological and pedagogical knowledge about teaching proficiency among criminology faculty. Quantitative research using a descriptive-correlational design involved 103 respondents from the selected schools offering criminology programs in the province of Misamis Oriental who were selected through purposive sampling. The instruments used in this study were the Technological Survey Questionnaire, the Pedagogical Survey Questionnaire, and the Teaching Proficiency Evaluation adopted from Witting. The findings showed that most of the respondents were young adults, mostly females with master's degree units, served less than five years and had contractual employment. The level of technological knowledge among criminology faculty was average. Somehow, the level of teaching proficiency among criminology faculty was high. The teachers' technical knowledge of word processing was significant to pedagogy, multimedia to course packages, and basic internet to course packages. Integration, communication technology, and assessment were significantly related to mastery of content and pedagogy. Teachers' motivation was significant to the integration and communication technology; instruction was highly significant to mastery of content, pedagogy, and integration and communication technology. The assessment was significant for mastery of content, pedagogy, and ICT integration. It is recommended that further studies be conducted using strong qualitative tools to investigate deep technological and pedagogical knowledge about teaching competence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aban, J., Bayan, A. R. A., & Valdez, J. S. (2024). Perceptions on the competence of science teachers along instruction in a state university in the philippines. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4943798

Aslan, A., & Zhu, C. (2017). Investigating variables predicting Turkish pre‐service teachers’ integration of ICT into teaching practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 552–

570. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12437

Armstrong-Mensah, E., Ramsey-White, K., Yankey, B., & Self-Brown, S. (2020). Covid-19 and distance learning: Effects on georgia state university school of public health students. Frontiers in Public Health, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.576227

Baran, E., & Uygun, E. (2016). Putting technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) in action: An integrated TPACK-design-based learning (DBL) approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(2), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2551

Barski, A. (2018). Advantage and Disadvantage of Internet in Education. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/2vykep7c

Caena, F., & Redecker, C. (2019). Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges: The case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators. European Journal of Education, 54(3), 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12345

Callo, E. C., & Yazon, A. D. (2020). Exploring the factors influencing the readiness of faculty and students on online teaching and learning as an alternative delivery mode for the new normal. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(8), 3509–3518. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080826

De Vera, J., Andrada, M., Bello, A., De Vera, M. (2020). Teachers' Competencies in Educational Technology Integration on Instructional Methodologies in the New Normal. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3885890

Obar, J. (2014). The Emerging Mobile Internet Underclass: A Critique of MobileInternet Access. An International Journal, 30(5), 1-2, https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2014.944726 Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., & Sharma, D. (2018). Online learning: Adoption, continuance, and learning outcome—A review of literature. International Journal of Information

Management, 43, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.05.005

Redmond, P., & Lock, J. (2019). Secondary pre-service teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (Tpack): What do they really think? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4214

Semlak, J. L., & Pearson, J. C. (2008). Through the years: An examination of instructor age and misbehavior on perceived teacher credibility. Communication Research Reports, 25(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090701831867

Stein, H., Gurevich, I., & Gorev, D. (2020). Integration of technology by novice mathematics teachers–what facilitates such integration and what makes it difficult? Education and Information Technologies

Thomas, M. (2020). Virtual teaching in the time of covid-19: Rethinking our weird pedagogical commitments to teacher education. Frontiers in Education, 5, 595574. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.595574

Downloads

Published

2024-11-22

How to Cite

Amba, R. J., & Jala, C. (2024). Technological and Pedagogical Knowledge in Relation to Teaching Proficiency among Criminology Faculty. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(12), 424–430. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0545