Online Professional Learning Networks (OPLNs) Integrated to the Community of Inquiry (CoI) Model: Basis for Professional Development for Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0411Keywords:
Cognitive presence, Community of inquiry, Online professional learning networks, Teaching presence, Teachers professional developmentAbstract
The findings of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) revealed a significant concern: where Philippine school principals agreed or strongly agreed that teachers possessed the necessary technical and pedagogical skills to integrate digital devices into education, they also reported that a shortage of teaching staff hindered the school's capacity to provide instruction. This study assessed the perceived impact of Online Professional Learning Networks (OPLNs) integrated to the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework on teacher professional development. Using a descriptive design, the study explored the impact of demographic profiles on OPLNs and their integration into the CoI model. The findings revealed that participation in OPLNs did not differ significantly based on respondents' demographic profiles. However, participation in OPLNs significantly impacted teaching performance, particularly in the CoI elements of "Teaching Presence" and "Cognitive Presence." However, the "Social Presence" element had no significant impact following OPLN integration. The prevalence of "Strongly Agree" ratings in the OPLNs sub-categories—Motivation, Design, and Sharing and Learning—highlighted OPLNs' effectiveness in promoting continuous learning and active participation among teachers. This suggests the vitality of ongoing professional development and positions OPLNs as effective tools for addressing issues such as limited opportunity for worldwide collaboration and interdisciplinary expertise. To receive the most benefits from OPLNs, educators and administrators should prioritize improving teaching and cognitive presence by encouraging critical thinking and facilitating organized discussions. These approaches have proven essential in improving educational outcomes and experiences. Furthermore, additional research should look into novel ways to improve "social presence" in OPLNs, such as including interactive elements, encouraging collaboration, and cultivating a supportive online community to increase learning satisfaction and engagement.
Downloads
References
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12, 3–22. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ837483
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01029.x
Allen, M. (2017). The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods (Vols. 1-4). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc
Alwafi, E. (2021). Tracing changes in teachers’ professional learning network on Twitter: Comparison of teachers’ social network structure and content of interaction before and during the COVID ‐19 pandemic. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(6), 1653–1665. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12607
Anderson., Ross, Jennifer, Katz-Buonincontro., Tracy, Bousselot., Jessica, Land., Mari, Livie., Nathaniel, Dafydd, Beard. (2022). Space that was safe to explore and learn: Stretching the affordances for networked professional learning in creativity for educators. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 55-75. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7879
Apoko., Tri, Tri, Wintolo, Moh., Balya, Ali, Sya’ban. (2022). The impact of online learning implementation on satisfaction, motivation, quality of the learning process, and student learning outcomes. Al-Ishlah, 14(4), 5923-5932. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i4.2096
Bhandari, P. (2020). Quantitative Research. Retrieved from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/quantitative-research/
Binder, J. F. (2022). Episodic and semantic memory for interactions with voice-based conversational agents: developing an integrative model of technology engagement and cognitive elaboration. In International Conference on Human-computer Interaction (pp. 322–334). Springer, Cham.
Bissessar, C., Black, D., & Boolaky, M. (2020). International Online Graduate Students’ Perceptions of CoI. European Journal of Open Distance and E-Learning, 23(1), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2020-0005
Borba, M. C., Santana de Souza Chiari, A., & Rangel Formiga Leite de Almeida, H. (2018). Interactions in virtual learning environments: New roles for digital technology. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 98, 269-286.
Bretz, C. (2021). Examining cognitive, social and teaching presence in a virtual professional continuing education workshop. Encompass Digital Archive: Occupational Therapy Doctorate Capstones. https://encompass.eku.edu/otdcapstones/83
Brown, C., and C. L. Poortman. (2018). Networks for Learning. Effective Collaboration for Teacher, School and System Improvement. London: Routledge.
Burbage, A. K., Jia, Y., & Hoang, T. (2023). The impact of community of inquiry and self-efficacy on student attitudes in sustained remote health professions learning environments. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 481. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04382-2
Chin, J. M. C., Ching, G. S., Del Castillo, F., Wen, T. H., Huang, Y. C., Del Castillo, C. D., Gungon, J. L., & Trajera, S. M. (2022). Perspectives on the Barriers to and Needs of Teachers’ Professional Development in the Philippines during COVID-19. Sustainability, 14(1), 470. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010470
Chouinard, R., Roy, N., Carpentier, G., & Bowen, F. (2022). Motivation, engagement et satisfaction des besoins psychologiques en formation initiale à l’enseignement lors des premières vagues de COVID-19. Revue Internationale Des Technologies En Pédagogie Universitaire, 19(1), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.18162/ritpu-2022-v19n1-06
Dell, D., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Vaughan, N. (2022). Community of inquiry: Designing for lifelong learning regulation. In 10th Pan-Commonwealth Forum on Open Learning, Canada.
Dicdiquin, J. B., Mobo, F. D., & Cutillas, A. L. (2023). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Professional Development Programs for Junior High School Mathematics Teachers in Improving Mathematics Instruction in the K to 12 Curriculum in the Philippines. International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 4(4), 1143–1153. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.04.12
Fiock, H. (2020). Designing a Community of Inquiry in Online Courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(1), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.3985
Galikyan, I., & Admiraal, W. (2019). Students’ engagement in asynchronous online discussion: The relationship between cognitive presence, learner prominence, and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 43, 100692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100692
Garrison, D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Garrison, D. R. (2018). Assessment of CoI Revisions. Retrieved from http://www.thecommunityofinquiry.org/editorial12
Grothaus, C. (2022). Collaborative online learning across cultures: The role of teaching and social presence. Qualitative Research in Education, 11(3), 298–326. https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.10474
He, L. (2022). Pathways to social presence in online learning communities. Learning & Education, 10(8), 91. https://doi.org/10.18282/l-e.v10i8.3070
Herro, D., Visser, R., & Qian, M. (2021). Teacher educators’ perspectives and practices towards the Technology Education Technology Competencies (Tetcs). Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(5), 623–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2021.1970620
Kavoura, T. (2022). Communities of Inquiry and the Case of the “Distance Education” Group during the COVID-19 Pandemic. European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, 0(0), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejeng.2022.1.cie.2964
Kilis, S., & Yildirim, Z. (2019). Posting patterns of students’ social presence, cognitive presence, and teaching presence in online learning. Online Learning, 23(2), 179–195. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1218389
Lambrev, V. S., & Cruz, B. C. (2023). Facilitating cognitive presence in online professional doctoral education: implications for practice-based programs. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 47(7), 889–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2023.2200134
Larson, K. E., Hirsch, S. E., McGraw, J. P., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2020). Preparing preservice teachers to manage behavior problems in the classroom: The feasibility and acceptability of using a mixed-reality simulator. Journal of Special Education Technology, 35(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643419836415
Lowenthal, P. R., & Dunlap, J. C. (2018). Investigating students’ perceptions of instructional strategies to establish social presence. Distance Education, 39(3), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1476844
Mahdi, H. S., & Al-Dera, A. S. (2013). The Impact of Teachers’ Age, Gender and Experience on the Use of Information and Communication Technology in EFL Teaching. English Language Teaching, 6(6), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n6p57
Martin, F., Wu, T., Wan, L., & Xie, K. (2022). A meta-analysis on the community of inquiry presences and learning outcomes in online and blended learning environments. Online Learning, 26(1), 325-359. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i1.2604
McCool, L. B. (2024). Examining social presence, team cohesion, and collaborative writing in online teams. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 87(2), 247–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906231156138
Moore, R. L., & Miller, C.N. (2022). Fostering presence in online courses: A systematic review (2008-2020). Online Learning, 26(1), 130-149. http://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i1.3071
Nasir, M. (2020). The influence of social presence on students’ satisfaction toward online course. Open Praxis, 12(4), 485-493. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.12.4.1141
Ngoho, M. G., & Pañares, N. C. (2023). School Heads’ Competencies And Teachers’ Performance. International Journal of Research Publications, 125(1), 395-402. https://doi.org/10.47119/ijrp1001251520234906
Ohayon, A., & Albulescu, I. (2023). Influence of Teachers Participation in Professional Learning Community on Their Teaching Skills. In I. Albulescu, & C. Stan (Eds.), Education, Reflection, Development - ERD 2022, vol 6. European Proceedings of Educational Sciences (pp. 445-451). European Publisher.
Pan, X. (2020). Technology acceptance, technological self-efficacy, and attitude toward technology-based self-directed learning: Learning motivation as a mediator. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 564294. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564294
Prenger, R., Poortman, C. L., & Handelzalts, A. (2021). Professional learning networks: From teacher learning to school improvement? Journal of Educational Change, 22(1), 13–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09383-2
Riyadi, A., & Sudiyatno, S. (2023). The impact of online learning on students learning motivation. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 13(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v13i1.46568
Sadaf, A., Kim, S. Y., & Olesova, L. (2022). Relationship between metacognition and online community of inquiry in an online case-based course. Online Learning, 26(4), 78-93. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i4.3474
Shively, K., & Geesa, R. L. (2023). An online professional learning series: Preparing p-12 educators to teach in online sel environments. In R. Rahimi & D. Liston (Eds.), Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design (pp. 271–295). IGI Global.
Stone, C., & Springer, M. (2019). Interactivity, connectedness and ‘teacher-presence’: Engaging and retaining students online. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 59, 147–149. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1235966.pdf
Tribunalo, R., & Ortizo, G. C. . (2023). Continuing Professional Development Model in the Schools Division of Sarangani. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(4), 1549–1568. https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v2i4.3744
Trust, T. (2012). Professional Learning Networks Designed for Teacher Learning. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(4), 133-138. http://www.iste.org/Store/Product.aspx?ID=2481
Trust, T., Krutka, D. G., & Carpenter, J. P. (2016). “Together we are better”: Professional learning networks for teachers. Computers and Education/Computers & Education, 102, 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.007
Trust, T., & Prestridge, S. (2021). The interplay of five elements of influence on educators’ PLN actions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 103195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103195
Utami, V. Q. N., Erita, N. Y., Kurniawan, N. F., & Syahril, N. D. (2023b). The Impact of Students’ Learning Motivation On Learning-Based E-Learning IPS & PKN. Journal of Digital Learning and Distance Education, 1(11), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v1i11.62
Vallis, C., Wilson, S., Tyrrell, J., & Narayan, V. (2022). Co-design as professional learning: Pulling each other in different directions, pulling together. In D. Forbes & R. Walker (Eds.), Developing Online Teaching in Higher Education (Vol. 29, pp. 133–146). Springer Nature Singapore.
Van Waes, S., De Maeyer, S., Moolenaar, N. M., Van Petegem, P., & Van Den Bossche, P. (2018). Strengthening networks: A social network intervention among higher education teachers. Learning and Instruction, 53, 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.07.005
Zheng, B., Ganotice, F. A., Lin, C.-H., & Tipoe, G. L. (2023). From self-regulation to co-regulation: Refining learning presence in a community of inquiry in interprofessional education. Medical Education Online, 28(1), 2217549. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2217549
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
